Friday, November 23, 2012
DNA news - now 80% is coding - down goes "junk DNA"
Design predicted this. All along it has been thought function will be found for so called "junk DNA". Now 80% is coding.
Labels:
design,
ENCODE,
IDvolution,
Junk DNA
Designed changes vs random changes
This paper shows that some "mutations" are designed changes directed by cellular machinery.
Genomic "tuning knobs" with implicit range are strategies for organisms to change and adapt as needed. We know about fine tuning in the universe, now we see it in life.
Remember the Genetic Piano post (here)? Which keys are chosen to play? What decides?
------------------------
and
Harvard cracks DNA storage, crams 700 terabytes of data into a single gram -Must see.....
Genomic "tuning knobs" with implicit range are strategies for organisms to change and adapt as needed. We know about fine tuning in the universe, now we see it in life.
Remember the Genetic Piano post (here)? Which keys are chosen to play? What decides?
------------------------
and
How Bees Decide What to Be: Reversible 'Epigenetic' Marks Linked to Behavior Patterns
and
Harvard cracks DNA storage, crams 700 terabytes of data into a single gram -Must see.....
Labels:
700 terabytes,
adam,
bees,
DNA,
ENCODE,
epigenetics,
eve,
fine tuning,
genetic piano,
genome,
harvard,
IDvolution,
mutations
Friday, September 28, 2012
Front Loading? Genetic Entropy? Complexity to simplicity?
More support for design and IDvolution.
Front Loading? Genetic Entropy? Complexity to simplicity? Devolution. Adam and Eve with preternatural gifts to modern day humans? Every day now more evidence comes in supporting IDvolution and design present at the beginning.
Research suggests that evolution sometimes meant becoming simpler, not more complex
(Phys.org)—The view that animals have become more complex over time could be a thing of the past, according to the latest research.
The new evidence, from scientists at the University of St Andrews, suggests that some modern day animals may have evolved instead by becoming less complex.
The researchers say that the discovery, of ghostly remains of gene neighbourhoods that once existed in a 550 million year old ancestor, suggests that the earliest animal was more complex than previously thought.
The findings, published later today in the journal, Current Biology, appear to contradict the common perception of evolution – that creatures have advanced by becoming genetically more complex over time.
more...
Front Loading? Genetic Entropy? Complexity to simplicity? Devolution. Adam and Eve with preternatural gifts to modern day humans? Every day now more evidence comes in supporting IDvolution and design present at the beginning.
Research suggests that evolution sometimes meant becoming simpler, not more complex
(Phys.org)—The view that animals have become more complex over time could be a thing of the past, according to the latest research.
The new evidence, from scientists at the University of St Andrews, suggests that some modern day animals may have evolved instead by becoming less complex.
The researchers say that the discovery, of ghostly remains of gene neighbourhoods that once existed in a 550 million year old ancestor, suggests that the earliest animal was more complex than previously thought.
The findings, published later today in the journal, Current Biology, appear to contradict the common perception of evolution – that creatures have advanced by becoming genetically more complex over time.
more...
Sunday, September 2, 2012
Godel's Incompleteness Theorem - in a nutshell.
Godel's Incompleteness Theorem - in a nutshell.
A good 10 minute video
If video does not play see it here: Kurt Godel - Incompleteness Theorem and Human Intuition
Saturday, July 14, 2012
From the uncommondescent blog. I found this to be very interesting and I have been watching this happen for a while now. We are witnessing a revolution in biology. Information has been coming faster now and this blog is attempting to keep visitors aware. The old paradigm is crumbling....yet TE's are trying to save it....
One has to ask why?
-------------
While I was shaving this morning I was thinking about the
materialists who are beginning to question the evolutionary mechanisms
proposed by the Neo-Darwinian Synthesis (e.g., Lynn Margulis and James
Shapiro). All of a sudden a great irony struck me. No doubt many of my
readers have already picked up on this, but I can be slow on the uptake
and it was kind of a stunner to me. The irony is this: Even among
materialists Neo-Darwinian Evolution is beginning to crumble under the
cumulative weight of the many absurdities it requires its adherents to
accept.
more...
One has to ask why?
-------------
Irony?
| July 13, 2012 | Posted by Barry Arrington under Intelligent Design |
more...
IDvolution anyone?
Wings, Horns, and Butterfly Eyespots: How Do Complex Traits Evolve?
......This work is difficult and time consuming, but the question at its core—the genetic origin of new and complex traits—is probably still one of the most pertinent and fundamental unanswered questions in evolution today. At stake is the possibility of testing whether novel complex traits arise from a gradual building of novel developmental networks, gene by gene, or whether pre-existent modules of interacting genes are recruited together to play novel roles in novel parts of the organism.
Thursday, May 3, 2012
Evolution is a Natural Process Running Backwards
This video makes a lot of sense. Additional posts:
Dr. John Sanford "Genetic Entropy and the Mystery of the Genome".
....and....
Dr. John Sanford "Genetic Entropy and the Mystery of the Genome".
....and....
Interview WIth Lynn Margulis - Natural selection eliminates and maybe maintains, but it doesn’t create.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)