Showing posts with label DNA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DNA. Show all posts
Saturday, July 22, 2023
Exploring a massive supercomplex in mitochondria comprising all four respiratory complexes
Exploring a massive supercomplex in mitochondria comprising all four respiratory complexes
Labels:
Bio-complexity,
complexity,
DNA,
IDvolution,
Irreducible Complexity,
mitochondria
Friday, April 29, 2022
Saturday, March 19, 2022
Saturday, May 9, 2020
Information is primary, even before matter and energy
In the beginning was the Word: the Word was with God and the Word was God.
Information is prime… IDvolution - God “breathed” the super language of DNA into the “kinds” in the creative act.
Friday, August 17, 2018
Sweeping gene survey reveals new facets of evolution
More evidence for IDvolution.
Sweeping gene survey reveals new facets of evolution
But is that true?
"The answer is no," said Stoeckle, lead author of the study, published in the journal Human Evolution.
For the planet's 7.6 billion people, 500 million house sparrows, or 100,000 sandpipers, genetic diversity "is about the same," he told AFP.
The study's most startling result, perhaps, is that nine out of 10 species on Earth today, including humans, came into being 100,000 to 200,000 years ago.
"This conclusion is very surprising, and I fought against it as hard as I could," Thaler told AFP.
“If individuals are stars, then species are galaxies,” said Thaler. “They are compact clusters in the vastness of empty sequence space.”
The absence of “in-between” species is something that also perplexed Darwin, he said."
Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2018-05-gene-survey-reveals-facets-evolution.html#jCp
Sweeping gene survey reveals new facets of evolution
It is textbook
biology, for example, that species with large, far-flung
populations—think ants, rats, humans—will become more genetically
diverse over time.
But is that true?
"The answer is no," said Stoeckle, lead author of the study, published in the journal Human Evolution.
For the planet's 7.6 billion people, 500 million house sparrows, or 100,000 sandpipers, genetic diversity "is about the same," he told AFP.
The study's most startling result, perhaps, is that nine out of 10 species on Earth today, including humans, came into being 100,000 to 200,000 years ago.
"This conclusion is very surprising, and I fought against it as hard as I could," Thaler told AFP.
Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2018-05-gene-survey-reveals-facets-evolution.html#jCp
It is textbook biology, for example, that species with large, far-flung populations—think ants, rats, humans—will become more genetically diverse over time.But is that true?
"The answer is no," said Stoeckle, lead author of the study, published in the journal Human Evolution.
For the planet's 7.6 billion people, 500 million house sparrows, or 100,000 sandpipers, genetic diversity "is about the same," he told AFP.
The study's most startling result, perhaps, is that nine out of 10 species on Earth today, including humans, came into being 100,000 to 200,000 years ago.
"This conclusion is very surprising, and I fought against it as hard as I could," Thaler told AFP.
Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2018-05-gene-survey-reveals-facets-evolution.html#jCp
But is that true?
"The answer is no," said Stoeckle, lead author of the study, published in the journal Human Evolution.
For the planet's 7.6 billion people, 500 million house sparrows, or 100,000 sandpipers, genetic diversity "is about the same," he told AFP.
The study's most startling result, perhaps, is that nine out of 10 species on Earth today, including humans, came into being 100,000 to 200,000 years ago.
"This conclusion is very surprising, and I fought against it as hard as I could," Thaler told AFP.
It is textbook
biology, for example, that species with large, far-flung
populations—think ants, rats, humans—will become more genetically
diverse over time.
But is that true?
"The answer is no," said Stoeckle, lead author of the study, published in the journal Human Evolution.
Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2018-05-gene-survey-reveals-facets-evolution.html#jCp
But is that true?
"The answer is no," said Stoeckle, lead author of the study, published in the journal Human Evolution.
Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2018-05-gene-survey-reveals-facets-evolution.html#jCp
It is textbook
biology, for example, that species with large, far-flung
populations—think ants, rats, humans—will become more genetically
diverse over time.
But is that true?
"The answer is no," said Stoeckle, lead author of the study, published in the journal Human Evolution.
Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2018-05-gene-survey-reveals-facets-evolution.html#jCp
But is that true?
"The answer is no," said Stoeckle, lead author of the study, published in the journal Human Evolution.
Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2018-05-gene-survey-reveals-facets-evolution.html#jCp
It is textbook
biology, for example, that species with large, far-flung
populations—think ants, rats, humans—will become more genetically
diverse over time.
But is that true?
"The answer is no," said Stoeckle, lead author of the study, published in the journal Human Evolution.
For the planet's 7.6 billion people, 500 million house sparrows, or 100,000 sandpipers, genetic diversity "is about the same," he told AFP.
The study's most startling result, perhaps, is that nine out of 10 species on Earth today, including humans, came into being 100,000 to 200,000 years ago.
"This conclusion is very surprising, and I fought against it as hard as I could," Thaler told AFP.
Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2018-05-gene-survey-reveals-facets-evolution.html#jCp
But is that true?
"The answer is no," said Stoeckle, lead author of the study, published in the journal Human Evolution.
For the planet's 7.6 billion people, 500 million house sparrows, or 100,000 sandpipers, genetic diversity "is about the same," he told AFP.
The study's most startling result, perhaps, is that nine out of 10 species on Earth today, including humans, came into being 100,000 to 200,000 years ago.
"This conclusion is very surprising, and I fought against it as hard as I could," Thaler told AFP.
Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2018-05-gene-survey-reveals-facets-evolution.html#jCp
It is textbook
biology, for example, that species with large, far-flung
populations—think ants, rats, humans—will become more genetically
diverse over time.
But is that true?
"The answer is no," said Stoeckle, lead author of the study, published in the journal Human Evolution.
Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2018-05-gene-survey-reveals-facets-evolution.html#jCp
“another unexpected finding from the study—species have very clear genetic boundaries, and there’s nothing much in between."But is that true?
"The answer is no," said Stoeckle, lead author of the study, published in the journal Human Evolution.
Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2018-05-gene-survey-reveals-facets-evolution.html#jCp
“If individuals are stars, then species are galaxies,” said Thaler. “They are compact clusters in the vastness of empty sequence space.”
The absence of “in-between” species is something that also perplexed Darwin, he said."
Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2018-05-gene-survey-reveals-facets-evolution.html#jCp
"If individuals are
stars, then species are galaxies," said Thaler. "They are compact
clusters in the vastness of empty sequence space."
The absence of "in-between" species is something that also perplexed Darwin, he said.
Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2018-05-gene-survey-reveals-facets-evolution.html#jCp
The absence of "in-between" species is something that also perplexed Darwin, he said.
Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2018-05-gene-survey-reveals-facets-evolution.html#jCp
Sweeping gene survey reveals new facets of evolution
Labels:
biology,
Darwin,
David Thaler.Mark Stoeckle,
DNA,
genes,
genetic,
IDvolution,
species
Wednesday, January 13, 2016
The Latest from Ann Gauger and Doug Axe
Ann Gauger on the Limits of Evolutionary Optimization
They discuss trying to get to shapes with meaning. Can a scribble on a page mutate to a han character with meaning? (protein folds)
“mutations and natural selection have limits and they can’t innovate anything unless the function they are innovating is already present… you already have to have the designed feature there in order to get it to improve… you cannot improve a pigment cell to an eye unless you already have something like an eye there.”
Paper
Model and Laboratory Demonstrations That Evolutionary Optimization Works Well Only If Preceded by Invention–Selection Itself Is Not Inventive
Abstract
Since biological inventions only benefit their possessors after they work, their origins cannot be attributed to their selective effects. One proposed solution to this conundrum is that selection perfects activities that already existed in rudimentary form before they became beneficial. An example of this idea for protein origins is the promiscuity hypothesis, which claims that minor aberrant side-reactions in enzymes can be evolutionary starting points for proficient new enzymes. Another example—the junk hypothesis—claims that proteins arising from accidental expression of non-genic DNA may likewise have slight activities that, through evolutionary optimization, lead to proficient enzymes. Here, we tested these proposals by observing how the endpoint of simple evolutionary optimization depends on the starting point. Beginning with optimization of protein-like constructs in the Stylus computational model, we compared promiscuous and junk starting points, where design elements specific to the test function were completely absent, to a starting point that retained most elements of a good design (mutation having disrupted some). In all three cases, evolutionary optimization improved activities by a large factor. The extreme weakness of the original activities, however, meant even large improvements could be inconsequential. Indeed, the endpoint was itself a proficient design only in the case where this design was largely present from the outset. Laboratory optimization of ampicillin-resistance proteins derived from a natural beta lactamase produced similar results. Our junk protein here was a deletion mutant that somehow confers weak resistance without the original catalytic mechanism (much of the active site having been lost). Evolutionary optimization was unable to improve that mutant. In contrast, a comparably weak mutant that retained the active site surpassed the natural beta lactamase after six rounds of selection. So, while mutation and selection can improve the proficiency of good designs through small structural adjustments, they seem unable to convert fortuitous selectable activities into good designs. http://bio-complexity.org/ojs/index.php/main/article/view/BIO-C.2015.2
Ann Gauger on the Limits of Evolutionary Optimization
They discuss trying to get to shapes with meaning. Can a scribble on a page mutate to a han character with meaning? (protein folds)
“mutations and natural selection have limits and they can’t innovate anything unless the function they are innovating is already present… you already have to have the designed feature there in order to get it to improve… you cannot improve a pigment cell to an eye unless you already have something like an eye there.”
Paper
Model and Laboratory Demonstrations That Evolutionary Optimization Works Well Only If Preceded by Invention–Selection Itself Is Not Inventive
Abstract
Since biological inventions only benefit their possessors after they work, their origins cannot be attributed to their selective effects. One proposed solution to this conundrum is that selection perfects activities that already existed in rudimentary form before they became beneficial. An example of this idea for protein origins is the promiscuity hypothesis, which claims that minor aberrant side-reactions in enzymes can be evolutionary starting points for proficient new enzymes. Another example—the junk hypothesis—claims that proteins arising from accidental expression of non-genic DNA may likewise have slight activities that, through evolutionary optimization, lead to proficient enzymes. Here, we tested these proposals by observing how the endpoint of simple evolutionary optimization depends on the starting point. Beginning with optimization of protein-like constructs in the Stylus computational model, we compared promiscuous and junk starting points, where design elements specific to the test function were completely absent, to a starting point that retained most elements of a good design (mutation having disrupted some). In all three cases, evolutionary optimization improved activities by a large factor. The extreme weakness of the original activities, however, meant even large improvements could be inconsequential. Indeed, the endpoint was itself a proficient design only in the case where this design was largely present from the outset. Laboratory optimization of ampicillin-resistance proteins derived from a natural beta lactamase produced similar results. Our junk protein here was a deletion mutant that somehow confers weak resistance without the original catalytic mechanism (much of the active site having been lost). Evolutionary optimization was unable to improve that mutant. In contrast, a comparably weak mutant that retained the active site surpassed the natural beta lactamase after six rounds of selection. So, while mutation and selection can improve the proficiency of good designs through small structural adjustments, they seem unable to convert fortuitous selectable activities into good designs. http://bio-complexity.org/ojs/index.php/main/article/view/BIO-C.2015.2
Labels:
Ann Gauger,
DNA,
Douglas Axe,
evolution,
IDvolution,
limits,
optimize
Friday, December 18, 2015
New class of DNA repair enzyme discovered
Over and over we are finding repair mechanisms that fight mutations and copying errors. Complex language that has meaning forward, backward and with layering. Where is the evidence leading?
Life is super complex and has purpose. The information to direct it came from a mind.
-------
New class of DNA repair enzyme discovered October 29, 2015
A new class of DNA repair enzyme has been discovered which demonstrates that a much broader range of damage can be removed from the double helix in ways that biologists did not think were possible.
According to the researchers, the AlkD mechanism has some remarkable properties:
Life is super complex and has purpose. The information to direct it came from a mind.
-------
New class of DNA repair enzyme discovered October 29, 2015
A new class of DNA repair enzyme has been discovered which demonstrates that a much broader range of damage can be removed from the double helix in ways that biologists did not think were possible.
According to the researchers, the AlkD mechanism has some remarkable properties:
- It can recognize damaged bases indirectly. AlkD identifies lesions by interacting with the DNA backbone without contacting the damaged base itself.
- It can repair many different types of lesions as long as they are positively charged. By contrast, the base-flipping mechanism used by other glycosylases relies on a relatively tight binding pocket in the enzyme, so each glycosylase is designed to work with a limited number of lesions. AlkD doesn't have the same type of pocket so it isn't restricted in the same way. Instead, the catalytic mechanism that AlkD uses is limited to removing positively charged lesions.
- It can excise much bulkier lesions than other glycosylases. Base excision repair is generally limited to relatively small lesions. A different pathway, called nucleotide excision repair, handles larger lesions like those caused by UV radiation damage. However, Eichman's team discovered that AlkD could excise extremely bulky lesions, such as the one caused by the antibiotic yatakemycin, which is beyond the capability of other glycosylases.
Front Loading? Genetic Entropy? Complexity to simplicity?
Phys.org)—The view that animals have become more complex over time
could be a thing of the past, according to the latest research.
The new evidence, from scientists at the University of St Andrews, suggests that some modern day animals may have evolved instead by becoming less complex.
The new evidence, from scientists at the University of St Andrews, suggests that some modern day animals may have evolved instead by becoming less complex.
-and-
Our Fragile Intellect
"Taken together, the large number of
genes required for intellectual and emotional function, and the unique
susceptibility of these genes to loss of heterozygosity, lead me to
conclude that we, as a species, are surprisingly intellectually fragile
and perhaps reached a peak 2000–6000 years ago. But if we are losing our
intellectual abilities, how did we acquire them in the first place?
This will be the topic of the next section [15]. "
You do the math.........
Labels:
complexity,
DNA,
Eichman,
glycosylase,
repair enzyme
Tuesday, December 15, 2015
The death of NeoDarwinism, No Selfish Gene
"The genome... is best described as a database used by organisms to generate the functions that you and I and others study as physiology."
"We inherit much more than DNA"
"The number of possible interactions , the number of possible circuits you could form 25,000 genes is 10^70,000. There wouldn't be enough time over the whole billions of years of the evolution of life on earth for nature to have explored but more than a tiny fraction of those."
On Dawkins and the selfish gene - "He is totally confused." "He has misused a metaphor" "He [Dawkins] is philosophically naive and I am afraid he has misled many people for a very considerable period of time." 40 minutes in
"There are no good or bad genes"
"There are reasons those genes are there"
"The great majority of people we are talking to were educated in biology 30 or 40 years ago and they really have no idea of the sea change that has occurred."
"the house of cards, the citadel if you like is empty, but many people still do not know that." 54 min
(more in comments below...)
Saturday, May 23, 2015
Evolution 2.0 New Book
“This book is groundbreaking in synthesizing the latest science. No other single book brings it all together so well.
Evolution 2.0 Breaking the Deadlock between Darwin and Design is a must read to those interested in the current state of the supposed conflict between faith and reason. It shows that where they intersect they are not in opposition.
Evolution 2.0 is the future. Beautifully written and engaging it is useful for the person who is eager to learn more and take the journey with Perry. It will especially appeal to engineers who design everyday and recognize it in the language of DNA and the sophistication of life. The Grand Design of life is fully appreciated on page after page.
Evolution 2.0 Breaking the Deadlock between Darwin and Design is a must read to those interested in the current state of the supposed conflict between faith and reason. It shows that where they intersect they are not in opposition.
Evolution 2.0 is the future. Beautifully written and engaging it is useful for the person who is eager to learn more and take the journey with Perry. It will especially appeal to engineers who design everyday and recognize it in the language of DNA and the sophistication of life. The Grand Design of life is fully appreciated on page after page.
Saturday, February 28, 2015
Genetic Piano Again
In a prior post Genetic Piano Perhaps someone was listening........
A while ago I posted on the idea that we should look at genes like keys on a piano. The number of tunes that can be cranked out is astounding. Sometimes a single key is played or in combinations. Some are rarely played but still can produce beautiful music.
Now someone else has picked up on this idea.
More support for IDvolution.
Now from Nature:
Now from Nature:
Epigenome: The symphony in your cells
A slew of papers reveals the chemical tweaks to DNA in a wealth
of different cells — as explained with the help of a small orchestra.
Labels:
DNA,
epigenetics,
epigenome,
genetic piano,
IDvolution,
Nature,
symphony
Tuesday, January 7, 2014
Paul Davies on the Origin of Life as an Information Problem
"Based on simple mathematical models, we think it may have happened suddenly, analogously to a heated gas abruptly bursting into flame."
IDvolution - God “breathed” the super language of DNA into the “kinds” in the creative act.
Paul Davies on the Origin of Life as an Information Problem
The Guardian features an interesting article by Paul Davies: “The secret of life won’t be cooked up in a chemistry lab: Life’s origins may only be explained through a study of its unique management of information.” Davies writes,
"If we cast the problem of life's origin in computer jargon, attempts at chemical synthesis focus exclusively on the hardware – the chemical substrate of life – but ignore the software – the informational aspect. To explain how life began we need to understand how its unique management of information came about.
To take a simple example; whether a cell expresses a gene can depend on mechanical stresses or electric fields acting on the whole cell by its environment. Thus, a change in global information (a pattern of force) at the macroscopic level translates into a change in local information movement at the microscopic level (switching on a gene). More generally, a range of signals received from its environment help to dictate how a cell's DNA is distributed and transcribed. Walker and I propose that the key transition on the road to life occurred when top-down information flow first predominated. Based on simple mathematical models, we think it may have happened suddenly, analogously to a heated gas abruptly bursting into flame"
Labels:
DNA,
IDvolution,
information,
Paul Davies,
top-down
Friday, November 22, 2013
Past 5,000 years prolific for changes to human genome
Past 5,000 years prolific for changes to human genome
A study published today in Nature3
now helps to clarify when many of those rare variants arose.
Researchers used deep sequencing to locate and date more than one
million single-nucleotide variants — locations where a single letter of
the DNA sequence is different from other individuals — in the genomes of
6,500 African and European Americans. The findings confirm their
earlier work suggesting that the majority of variants, including
potentially harmful ones, were picked up during the past 5,000–10,000
years. Researchers also saw the genetic stamp of the diverging migratory
history of the two groups.
Saturday, September 21, 2013
Book Review: Darwin’s Doubt: The Explosive Origin of Animal Life and the Case for Intelligent Design
Slowly but surely we are finding life is more complex than we ever thought. From the review: Darwinism and Materialism: They Sink or Swim Together He quotes the information theorist Henry Quastler who stated that “the creation of information is habitually associated with conscious activity.”
"Will Stephen Meyer’s Darwin’s Doubt be “the most despised science book” of 2013?"
"Recently the Discovery Institute’s Stephen Meyer published Darwin’s Doubt, a book that raises many questions about the theory of evolution. As his title tells us, Darwin himself shared one of these doubts. The book has sold well, reaching #7 on the New York Times bestseller list, #4 on the Los Angeles Times list, and #10 on Publishers Weekly." “Darwin said that speciation occurred too slowly for us to see it. Gould and Eldredge said it occurred too quickly for us to see it. Either way we don’t see it.”
"Organisms are intelligently designed, says Meyer, who has a PhD from Cambridge University in the philosophy of science. His book is an education, demanding attentive reading but no specialized knowledge. To a large extent it uses the facts and arguments of professional biologists, some bordering on open dissent from the orthodoxy."
So we see more support for IDvolution - God “breathed” the super language of DNA into the “kinds” in the creative act.
"Will Stephen Meyer’s Darwin’s Doubt be “the most despised science book” of 2013?"
"Recently the Discovery Institute’s Stephen Meyer published Darwin’s Doubt, a book that raises many questions about the theory of evolution. As his title tells us, Darwin himself shared one of these doubts. The book has sold well, reaching #7 on the New York Times bestseller list, #4 on the Los Angeles Times list, and #10 on Publishers Weekly." “Darwin said that speciation occurred too slowly for us to see it. Gould and Eldredge said it occurred too quickly for us to see it. Either way we don’t see it.”
"Organisms are intelligently designed, says Meyer, who has a PhD from Cambridge University in the philosophy of science. His book is an education, demanding attentive reading but no specialized knowledge. To a large extent it uses the facts and arguments of professional biologists, some bordering on open dissent from the orthodoxy."
So we see more support for IDvolution - God “breathed” the super language of DNA into the “kinds” in the creative act.
Saturday, January 5, 2013
Information - the Word, The Logos
This is a video worth watching. The Q an A is also interesting. The tide is turning....
More support for IDvolution - God “breathed” the super language of DNA into the “kinds” in the creative act.
"the displacement problem - where every attempt to explain the origin of information absent an intelligent agent either fails or it surreptitiously smuggles in the effect of intelligent agency...."
... "a byproduct of this artificial restriction on reasoning that excludes the reality of something of which we all know, which is mind, agency has certain causal powers that nature itself by itself does not have and when we encounter effects that we know only agents can produce it is rational to infer the activity of agency not to exclude it on principle and say well we must be scientific"
More support for IDvolution - God “breathed” the super language of DNA into the “kinds” in the creative act.
"the displacement problem - where every attempt to explain the origin of information absent an intelligent agent either fails or it surreptitiously smuggles in the effect of intelligent agency...."
... "a byproduct of this artificial restriction on reasoning that excludes the reality of something of which we all know, which is mind, agency has certain causal powers that nature itself by itself does not have and when we encounter effects that we know only agents can produce it is rational to infer the activity of agency not to exclude it on principle and say well we must be scientific"
'Intelligent Design: The Most Credible Idea?' A Lecture by Dr Stephen C Meyer
Friday, November 23, 2012
Designed changes vs random changes
This paper shows that some "mutations" are designed changes directed by cellular machinery.
Genomic "tuning knobs" with implicit range are strategies for organisms to change and adapt as needed. We know about fine tuning in the universe, now we see it in life.
Remember the Genetic Piano post (here)? Which keys are chosen to play? What decides?
------------------------
and
Harvard cracks DNA storage, crams 700 terabytes of data into a single gram -Must see.....
Genomic "tuning knobs" with implicit range are strategies for organisms to change and adapt as needed. We know about fine tuning in the universe, now we see it in life.
Remember the Genetic Piano post (here)? Which keys are chosen to play? What decides?
------------------------
and
How Bees Decide What to Be: Reversible 'Epigenetic' Marks Linked to Behavior Patterns
and
Harvard cracks DNA storage, crams 700 terabytes of data into a single gram -Must see.....
Labels:
700 terabytes,
adam,
bees,
DNA,
ENCODE,
epigenetics,
eve,
fine tuning,
genetic piano,
genome,
harvard,
IDvolution,
mutations
Friday, March 2, 2012
Epigenetics, Epigenetics and more epigenetics.
For some time I have been claiming that epigenetic inheritance is a problem for evolution. Here we have Science Daily agreeing.This rapid ability to produce variation is in agreement with IDvolution.
From the article: "The results suggest that domestication has led to epigenetic changes. For more than 70 % of the genes, domesticated chickens retained a higher degree of methylation. Since methylation is a much faster process than random mutations, and may occur as a result of stress and other experiences, this may explain how variation within a species can increase so dramatically in just a short time."
From the article: "The results suggest that domestication has led to epigenetic changes. For more than 70 % of the genes, domesticated chickens retained a higher degree of methylation. Since methylation is a much faster process than random mutations, and may occur as a result of stress and other experiences, this may explain how variation within a species can increase so dramatically in just a short time."
Inherited Epigenetics Produced Record Fast Evolution
Heritable genome-wide variation of gene expression and promoter methylation between wild and domesticated chickens
Labels:
chickens,
DNA,
epigenetics,
genes,
genomics,
IDvolution
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
The Origin of Life - Professor John Walton demonstates the odds against a random start
Professor Walton takes us through the chemistry and shows us the RNA world scenario is impossible. Life was complex at the earliest times.
The Origin of Life
Conclusions:
The Origin of Life
Conclusions:
- Statistically, the chance of forming even one “useful” RNA sequence can be shown to be essentially zero in the lifetime of the earth.
- The complexity of the first self-replicating system, and the information needed to build it, imply intelligent design.
- Hope of beating the colossal odds against random formation of replicating RNA is based on ideology rather than science.
- As lab experiments on model replicators become more complex they demonstrate the need for input from intelligent mind(s).
- Acceptance of an early earth atmosphere free of oxygen atoms strains belief beyond breaking point!
- No chemically or geologically plausible routes to nucleotides or RNA strands have been developed.
- Geological field work shows no support for a “prebiotic soup.” It favors little change in the atmosphere over time. Living things have been present since the first crustal rocks.
- After over 50 years of sterile origin of life research it is time to give intelligent design a fair hearing.
Labels:
DNA,
IDvolution,
intelligent design,
John Walton,
prebiotic soup,
RNA,
science
Tuesday, December 27, 2011
Molecular Animation - from genomic information to protein synthesis
A video on the inner workings of the cell. See the molecular machinery in action.
The movie "The Central Dogma: From Genomic Information to Protein Synthesis" is made by RIKEN Omics Science Center (RIKEN OSC) for the exhibition titled "Beyond DNA" held at National Science Museum of Japan. We tried to illustrate how molecular machines interact each other in the central dogma by giving "Japanese robot-anime" style representation to the molecules. By using this approach, people (especially kids) can easily distinguish between those molecules and understand how they function in our body.
The movie "The Central Dogma: From Genomic Information to Protein Synthesis" is made by RIKEN Omics Science Center (RIKEN OSC) for the exhibition titled "Beyond DNA" held at National Science Museum of Japan. We tried to illustrate how molecular machines interact each other in the central dogma by giving "Japanese robot-anime" style representation to the molecules. By using this approach, people (especially kids) can easily distinguish between those molecules and understand how they function in our body.
Friday, May 13, 2011
Genetic Piano
Perhaps someone was listening........
A while ago I posted on the idea that we should look at genes like keys on a piano. The number of tunes that can be cranked out is astounding. Sometimes a single key is played or in combinations. Some are rarely played but still can produce beautiful music.
Now someone else has picked up on this idea.
More support for IDvolution.
Study gives clue as to how notes are played on the genetic piano
The NOVA U.S. public television program described epigenetics as “The Ghost In Your Genes.” It is the study of changes in gene expression that occur without changes in DNA sequence. Like keys on a piano, DNA is the static blueprint for all the proteins that cells produce. Epigenetic information provides additional dynamic or flexible instructions as to how, where and when the blueprint will be used. “It corresponds to a pianist playing a piece of music,” said Kohzoh Mitsuya, Ph.D., postdoctoral fellow in the School of Medicine at The University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio.
Why Some Genes Are Silenced: Researchers Find Clue as to How Notes Are Played On the 'Genetic Piano' 'Like keys on a piano, DNA is the static blueprint for all the proteins that cells produce. Epigenetic information provides additional dynamic or flexible instructions as to how, where and when the blueprint will be used. "It corresponds to a pianist playing a piece of music," said Kohzoh Mitsuya, Ph.D., postdoctoral fellow in the School of Medicine at The University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio.'
A while ago I posted on the idea that we should look at genes like keys on a piano. The number of tunes that can be cranked out is astounding. Sometimes a single key is played or in combinations. Some are rarely played but still can produce beautiful music.
Now someone else has picked up on this idea.
More support for IDvolution.
Study gives clue as to how notes are played on the genetic piano
The NOVA U.S. public television program described epigenetics as “The Ghost In Your Genes.” It is the study of changes in gene expression that occur without changes in DNA sequence. Like keys on a piano, DNA is the static blueprint for all the proteins that cells produce. Epigenetic information provides additional dynamic or flexible instructions as to how, where and when the blueprint will be used. “It corresponds to a pianist playing a piece of music,” said Kohzoh Mitsuya, Ph.D., postdoctoral fellow in the School of Medicine at The University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio.
Why Some Genes Are Silenced: Researchers Find Clue as to How Notes Are Played On the 'Genetic Piano' 'Like keys on a piano, DNA is the static blueprint for all the proteins that cells produce. Epigenetic information provides additional dynamic or flexible instructions as to how, where and when the blueprint will be used. "It corresponds to a pianist playing a piece of music," said Kohzoh Mitsuya, Ph.D., postdoctoral fellow in the School of Medicine at The University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio.'
Labels:
DNA,
epigenetics,
genetic piano,
genetics,
IDvolution,
intelligent design
Thursday, January 13, 2011
Timely peer reviewed paper - more support for IDvolution
Timely peer reviewed paper - more support for IDvolution
Andy McIntosh’s Peer-Reviewed ID Paper–Note the Editor’s Note!
“Information and Entropy—Top-Down or Bottom-Up Development in Living Systems?” International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics 4(4) (2009): 351-385
Abstract: This paper deals with the fundamental and challenging question of the ultimate origin of genetic information from a thermodynamic perspective. The theory of evolution postulates that random mutations and natural selection can increase genetic information over successive generations. It is often argued from an evolutionary perspective that this does not violate the second law of thermodynamics because it is proposed that the entropy of a non-isolated system could reduce due to energy input from an outside source, especially the sun when considering the earth as a biotic system. By this it is proposed that a particular system can become organised at the expense of an increase in entropy elsewhere. However, whilst this argument works for structures such as snowflakes that are formed by natural forces, it does not work for genetic information because the information system is composed of machinery which requires precise and non-spontaneous raised free energy levels – and crystals like snowflakes have zero free energy as the phase transition occurs. The functional machinery of biological systems such as DNA, RNA and proteins requires that precise, non-spontaneous raised free energies be formed in the molecular bonds which are maintained in a far from equilibrium state. Furthermore, biological structures contain coded instructions which, as is shown in this paper, are not defined by the matter and energy of the molecules carrying this information. Thus, the specified complexity cannot be created by natural forces even in conditions far from equilibrium. The genetic information needed to code for complex structures like proteins actually requires information which organises the natural forces surrounding it and not the other way around – the information is crucially not defined by the material on which it sits. The information system locally requires the free energies of the molecular machinery to be raised in order for the information to be stored. Consequently, the fundamental laws of thermodynamics show that entropy reduction which can occur naturally in non-isolated systems is not a sufficient argument to explain the origin of either biological machinery or genetic information that is inextricably intertwined with it. This paper highlights the distinctive and non-material nature of information and its relationship with matter, energy and natural forces. It is proposed in conclusion that it is the non-material information (transcendent to the matter and energy) that is actually itself constraining the local thermodynamics to be in ordered disequilibrium and with specified raised free energy levels necessary for the molecular and cellular machinery to operate.
Andy McIntosh’s Peer-Reviewed ID Paper–Note the Editor’s Note!
“Information and Entropy—Top-Down or Bottom-Up Development in Living Systems?” International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics 4(4) (2009): 351-385
Abstract: This paper deals with the fundamental and challenging question of the ultimate origin of genetic information from a thermodynamic perspective. The theory of evolution postulates that random mutations and natural selection can increase genetic information over successive generations. It is often argued from an evolutionary perspective that this does not violate the second law of thermodynamics because it is proposed that the entropy of a non-isolated system could reduce due to energy input from an outside source, especially the sun when considering the earth as a biotic system. By this it is proposed that a particular system can become organised at the expense of an increase in entropy elsewhere. However, whilst this argument works for structures such as snowflakes that are formed by natural forces, it does not work for genetic information because the information system is composed of machinery which requires precise and non-spontaneous raised free energy levels – and crystals like snowflakes have zero free energy as the phase transition occurs. The functional machinery of biological systems such as DNA, RNA and proteins requires that precise, non-spontaneous raised free energies be formed in the molecular bonds which are maintained in a far from equilibrium state. Furthermore, biological structures contain coded instructions which, as is shown in this paper, are not defined by the matter and energy of the molecules carrying this information. Thus, the specified complexity cannot be created by natural forces even in conditions far from equilibrium. The genetic information needed to code for complex structures like proteins actually requires information which organises the natural forces surrounding it and not the other way around – the information is crucially not defined by the material on which it sits. The information system locally requires the free energies of the molecular machinery to be raised in order for the information to be stored. Consequently, the fundamental laws of thermodynamics show that entropy reduction which can occur naturally in non-isolated systems is not a sufficient argument to explain the origin of either biological machinery or genetic information that is inextricably intertwined with it. This paper highlights the distinctive and non-material nature of information and its relationship with matter, energy and natural forces. It is proposed in conclusion that it is the non-material information (transcendent to the matter and energy) that is actually itself constraining the local thermodynamics to be in ordered disequilibrium and with specified raised free energy levels necessary for the molecular and cellular machinery to operate.
Labels:
Andy McIntosh,
DNA,
genetics,
IDvolution,
intelligent design
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)